Our Capability Statement

Download a Copy of Our Gov Slick

Why Speed Is the DoW’s Real AI Advantage

Why Speed Is the DoW’s Real AI Advantage

Jan 14, 2026

Recent Posts

Cover image for Haley Chase speaking into a microphone at a desk, set against a red background with text reading ‘The Top 5 Government Acquisition Sites Contractors Really Use to Separate Strategy From Guesswork,’ alongside logos for SAM.gov, USAspending.gov, HigherGov, GovTribe, and GovWin.

Contract Management

Five Government Acquisition Sites That Separate Strategy From Guesswork

Jan 6, 2026

Anyone who has spent time searching for government contracts knows the problem: there is no shortage of platforms claiming to be “the best” place to find opportunities.The real challenge is figuring out which ones actually make your job easier, and which ones simply add noise.In a crowded acquisition ecosystem, knowing where to look — and why — can be the difference between informed strategy and wasted effort. Below is a practical breakdown of five government acquisition sites that consistently show up in serious contracting workflows, what each one does well, and where each one falls short.SAM.gov: The Foundation Every Contractor Starts WithIf an opportunity is being competed publicly by the federal government, it will appear on SAM.gov. This is the official system of record for federal contracting, entity registration, and public solicitations.SAM.gov allows contractors to:Register and maintain their entity recordSearch for open solicitationsReview award notices and contract historyWhat SAM.gov does not do particularly well is forecasting. Opportunities released under restricted contract vehicles — such as GSA schedules, SEWP, or other IDIQs — may never appear publicly, limiting its usefulness for early-stage capture planning (U.S. General Services Administration, OASIS+ Program Documentation).SAM.gov is essential. It just isn’t sufficient on its own.GovWin by Deltek: Built for Forecasting, Not BrowsingGovWin by Deltek is widely considered one of the most powerful tools for business development and capture strategy in federal contracting.Its strength lies in pre-RFP intelligence, analyst insights, agency profiles, and long-range forecasting. GovWin also allows companies to publicly signal interest in opportunities, creating visibility for teaming and partnership discussions.That depth comes at a cost. GovWin’s pricing model typically places it out of reach for startups and very small businesses. It is best suited for organizations with an established capture team and a mature pipeline.When used correctly, GovWin is less about finding today’s opportunity and more about shaping tomorrow’s.HigherGov: Turning Complex Data Into Usable InsightHigherGov has gained traction in recent years for one simple reason: it makes government data easier to understand.The platform pulls information from sources like SAM.gov and USAspending.gov, then organizes it into clear, visual dashboards that highlight incumbents, agency behavior, contract history, and competitive patterns (HigherGov Platform Overview).HigherGov is particularly effective for:Vetting potential teaming partnersResearching competitorsUnderstanding historical performance across agenciesWhile it does not replace deep forecasting tools, HigherGov excels at helping teams see the broader market landscape and identify where they may realistically fit.GovTribe: Awareness, Alerts, and Community InsightSimply put, GovTribe is designed for awareness rather than analytics.Its interface is clean and beginner-friendly, allowing users to follow agencies, competitors, and specific opportunities while receiving real-time alerts as activity changes (GovTribe Platform Overview).GovTribe’s value lies in staying informed. Its limitations appear when deeper analysis or forecasting is required. Compared to GovWin or HigherGov, GovTribe is more about tracking motion than predicting outcomes.For teams early in their contracting journey, or for anyone who needs timely visibility without complexity, GovTribe fills an important niche.USAspending.gov: Following the Money, Not the LeadsUSAspending.gov exists for one primary purpose: transparency.The platform provides detailed data on federal spending by agency, recipient, NAICS code, and contract type, allowing users to identify where government dollars are flowing (USAspending.gov Data Overview).USAspending is not a lead-generation tool. It will not tell you what is coming next. What it does exceptionally well is show where money has already been spent, which can inform strategic planning, market entry decisions, and competitive analysis when paired with other tools.Without clear direction, the data can feel overwhelming. With purpose, it becomes a powerful planning resource.How These Tools Fit TogetherEach of these platforms plays a distinct role:GovWin supports forecasting and capture strategyHigherGov excels at market visualization and teaming analysisGovTribe enables tracking and real-time awarenessSAM.gov provides official solicitation accessUSAspending.gov reveals spending patterns and trendsThe most effective contractors rarely rely on a single source. As organizational maturity increases, so does the need for a blended approach that balances visibility, insight, and validation.The real advantage isn’t using every tool — it’s knowing which ones support your goals at each stage of maturity. For additional context on how these choices affect cost, resourcing, and long-term strategy, check out our blog “What Does It Really Cost to Pursue a Federal Contract?”

Cover image for Three professionals converse at a government and defense industry conference. Two uniformed military service members speak with a civilian attendee holding a coffee, surrounded by other attendees and exhibitor booths in the background.

Contract Management

When Sales Experience Becomes a Liability in GovCon

Jan 2, 2026

Federal missions rarely fail because people are not trying hard enough. They fail because expectations were misaligned long before execution began.Operational teams see this pattern repeatedly. A solution is well presented. The vendor is confident. The proposal checks every box. Then delivery begins, and reality intrudes. Timelines collapse under operational tempo. Assumptions unravel. The solution technically meets the requirement, but it does not hold up in the mission environment.When that happens, the problem is rarely bad intent or weak engineering. It is something more fundamental.The industry partner never truly understood the mission.The Gap Few People Want to NameAcross government programs, a quiet frustration surfaces again and again. Many industry partners know how to sell, but not how missions actually operate.This gap is often attributed to vague requirements or communication breakdowns. In practice, it is an experience gap.Sales experience teaches professionals how to frame value, manage pipelines, and advance opportunities. Those skills matter. But they do not teach what it feels like to operate under constant pressure, limited resources, shifting priorities, and real consequences.Mission experience does.Operational teams work in environments where tradeoffs are unavoidable. Systems must function under stress. Processes must adapt in real time. Decisions are shaped as much by constraints as by objectives. When industry partners have not lived in those conditions, they tend to design for an idealized version of the mission. Solutions become optimized for proposals and compliance rather than survivability and usefulness.That is where misalignment begins.What Mission Experience ChangesProfessionals who have spent time on the mission side approach industry engagement differently, even when they later move into sales or capture roles.They ask different questions. Instead of starting with what is theoretically possible, they start with what is operationally realistic. They listen for constraints that never appear in requirements documents. They understand that staffing gaps, competing priorities, and organizational friction are not exceptions. They are the baseline.Mission experience also sharpens judgment. When timelines sound too optimistic or architectures too clean, experienced operators recognize the risk immediately. This is not cynicism. It is precision born from having watched plans break under real conditions.Most importantly, mission experience creates credibility. Operational teams can tell when an industry partner understands their environment. Conversations move faster. Explanations become clearer. Trust builds because understanding is demonstrated, not claimed.Where Sales-First Engagement Breaks DownSales-driven engagement prioritizes momentum. That can be useful. But without mission grounding, momentum often works against mission success.The same patterns repeat across programs. Solutions are scoped without accounting for operational handoffs. Timelines assume ideal staffing and uninterrupted progress. Requirements are interpreted literally rather than contextually. Risk is minimized early and absorbed later by government teams.When this happens, operational teams compensate. They clarify. They adjust. They fill gaps. The mission moves forward, but not because the partnership is strong. It moves forward because government teams absorb the friction.Mission experience changes that dynamic by aligning expectations earlier and more honestly, before commitments are locked in.What Mission-Aligned Industry Engagement Actually Looks LikePointing out the problem is not enough. Industry has to change how it shows up.Mission-aligned engagement does not require everyone in industry to have worn a uniform or worked on the operational side. It does require intentional shifts in behavior.Partners who consistently earn trust from operational teams slow down early. They treat initial conversations as discovery rather than persuasion. They ask how work actually flows, where friction lives, and what failure looks like in practice.They pressure-test their own ideas. They invite pushback. They acknowledge tradeoffs instead of hiding them. And they translate technical decisions into operational impact rather than overwhelming teams with features or frameworks.Most importantly, they stay grounded in execution reality. They plan for staffing gaps, shifting priorities, and external dependencies instead of assuming them away.This approach does not slow programs down. It prevents rework, frustration, and erosion of trust later.The Shift Industry Can No Longer AvoidThis shift from sales-first engagement to mission-aligned partnership is already underway across the GovCon ecosystem. Professionals with lived mission experience are reshaping how industry engages — not through louder messaging, but through deeper understanding of how missions actually operate.Capture Management professionals like Shawn Cressman reflect a growing group of industry leaders who bring lived mission experience into sales, capture, and delivery roles. Their credibility does not come from polished pitches. It comes from having operated inside real mission environments and carrying those lessons forward.In a recent episode of Unsolicited, Shawn described how his unconventional path — from running a small business to operating Air Force cyber defense systems to working in capture — fundamentally shaped how he engages with government missions today. His perspective reinforces a reality operational teams have long understood.Understanding the mission changes everything.The future of effective government partnerships will not be driven by louder sales efforts. It will be driven by professionals who take the time to understand how missions actually work and design solutions that respect that reality.Because in federal missions, understanding the mission is not optional. It is the difference between a solution that looks good and one that actually works.

Title	Category	Published Date